Browse Prior Art Database

Official Internet protocols (RFC1011)

IP.com Disclosure Number: IPCOM000001815D
Original Publication Date: 1987-May-01
Included in the Prior Art Database: 2000-Sep-12
Document File: 42 page(s) / 68K

Publishing Venue

Internet Society Requests For Comment (RFCs)

Related People

J.K. Reynolds: AUTHOR [+2]

Abstract

This RFC identifies the documents specifying the official protocols used in the Internet. Comments indicate any revisions or changes planned.

This text was extracted from a ASCII Text document.
This is the abbreviated version, containing approximately 4% of the total text.

Network Working Group J. Reynolds

Request for Comments: 1011 J. Postel

ISI

Obsoletes: RFCs 991, 961, 943, 924, 901, 880, 840 May 1987

OFFICIAL INTERNET PROTOCOLS

STATUS OF THIS MEMO

This memo is an official status report on the protocols used in the

Internet community. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.

INTRODUCTION

This RFC identifies the documents specifying the official protocols

used in the Internet. Comments indicate any revisions or changes

planned.

To first order, the official protocols are those specified in the

"DDN Protocol Handbook" (DPH), dated December 1985 (this is a three

volume set with a total thickness of about 5 inches).

Older collections that include many of these specifications are the

"Internet Protocol Transition Workbook" (IPTW), dated March 1982; the

"Internet Mail Protocols", dated November 1982; and the "Internet

Telnet Protocols and Options", dated June 1983. There is also a

volume of protocol related information called the "Internet Protocol

Implementers Guide" (IPIG) dated August 1982. An even older

collection is the "ARPANET Protocol Handbook" (APH) dated

January 1978. Nearly all the relevant material from these

collections has been reproduced in the current DPH.

The following material is organized as a sketchy outline. The

entries are protocols (e.g., Transmission Control Protocol). In each

entry there are notes on status, specification, comments, other

references, dependencies, and contact.

The STATUS is one of: required, recommended, elective,

experimental, or none.

The SPECIFICATION identifies the protocol defining documents.

The COMMENTS describe any differences from the specification or

problems with the protocol.

The OTHER REFERENCES identify documents that comment on or expand

on the protocol.

RFC 1011 - Official Internet Protocols May 1987

The DEPENDENCIES indicate what other protocols are called upon by

this protocol.

The CONTACT indicates a person who can answer questions about the

protocol.

In particular, the status may be:

required

- all hosts must implement the required protocol,

recommended

- all hosts are encouraged to implement the recommended

protocol,

elective

- hosts may implement or not the elective protocol,

experimental

- hosts should not implement the experimental protocol

unless they are participating in the experiment and have

coordinated their use of this protocol with the contact

person, and

none

- this is not a protocol.

For further information about protocols in general, please

contact:

Joyce K. Reynolds

U...