The Naming of Hosts (RFC2100)
Original Publication Date: 1997-Apr-01
Included in the Prior Art Database: 2000-Sep-13
Internet Society Requests For Comment (RFCs)
This RFC is a commentary on the difficulty of deciding upon an acceptably distinctive hostname for one's computer, a problem which grows in direct proportion to the logarithmically increasing size of the Internet.
Network Working Group J. Ashworth
Request for Comments: 2100 Ashworth & Associates
Category: Informational 1 April 1997
The Naming of Hosts
Status of this Memo
This memo provides information for the Internet community. This memo
does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of
this memo is unlimited.
This RFC is a commentary on the difficulty of deciding upon an
acceptably distinctive hostname for one's computer, a problem which
grows in direct proportion to the logarithmically increasing size of
Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
Except to TS Eliot.
And, for that matter, to David Addison, who hates iambic pentameter.
The Naming of Hosts is a difficult matter,
It isn't just one of your holiday games;
You may think at first I'm as mad as a hatter
When I tell you, a host must have THREE DIFFERENT NAMES.
First of all, there's the name that the users use daily,
Such as venus, athena, and cisco, and ames,
Such as titan or sirius, hobbes or europa--
All of them sensible everyday names.
There are fancier names if you think they sound sweeter,
Some for the web pages, some for the flames:
Such as mercury, phoenix, orion, and charon--
But all of them sensible everyday names.
But I tell you, a host needs a name that's particular,
A name that's peculiar, and more dignified,
Else how can it keep its home page perpendicular,
And spread out its data, send pages world wide?
Of names of this kind, I can give you a quorum,
Like lothlorien, pothole, or kobyashi-maru,
Such as pearly-gates.vatican, or else diplomatic-
Names that never belong to more than one host.
But above and beyond there's still one name left over,
And that is the name that you never will guess;
The name that no human research can discover--
But THE NAMESERVER KNOWS, and will us'ually confess.
When you notice a client in rapt meditation,
The reason, I tell you, is always the same:
The code is engaged in a deep consultation
On the address, the address, the address of its name:
Deep and inscrutable,
Thanks to Don Libes, Mark Lottor, and a host of twisted
individuals^W^Wcreative sysadmins for providing source material for
this memo, to Andrew Lloyd-Webber, Cameron Mackintosh, and a cast of
thousands (particularly including Terrance Mann) who drew my
attention to the necessity, and of course, to Thomas Stearns Eliot,
for making this all necessary.
 Libes, D., "Choosing a Name for Your Computer", Communications
of the ACM, Vol. 32, No. 11, Pg. 1289, November 1989.
 Lottor, M. et al.,...