Dismiss
InnovationQ/InnovationQ Plus content will be updated on Sunday, June 25, 10am ET, with new patent and non-patent literature collections. Click here to learn more.
Browse Prior Art Database

Use of FTP by the NIC Journal (RFC0479)

IP.com Disclosure Number: IPCOM000003622D
Original Publication Date: 1973-Mar-08
Included in the Prior Art Database: 2000-Sep-13
Document File: 5 page(s) / 10K

Publishing Venue

Internet Society Requests For Comment (RFCs)

Related People

J.E. White: AUTHOR

Abstract

At the Network Mail Meeting (see -- 14317,) the NIC outlined it's requirements for implementing FTP Journal delivery and submission.

This text was extracted from a ASCII Text document.
This is the abbreviated version, containing approximately 28% of the total text.

Network Working Group James E. White (JEW)

Request for Comments: 479 SRI-ARC

NIC: 14948 March 8, 1973

Use of FTP by the NIC Journal

At the Network Mail Meeting (see -- 14317,) the NIC outlined it's

requirements for implementing FTP Journal delivery and submission.

It had always been our thinking that those two services should rely

upon the File Transfer Protocol's MLFL command for their

implementation.

Prior to the meeting, we had envisioned that, in the case of

submission, for example, the user would embed what parameters the NIC

required (e.g., an indication that this piece of mail was to be

journalized, a list of NIC idents, etc.) in the USERNAME field of the

MLFL command, in a way that was transparent to his FTP user process,

and that SRI-ARC's FTP server process would parse the 'user name' for

the parameters and internally invoke the Journal System with them and

the text of the mail as arguments.

Our goal (which this scheme would have satisfied) was to provide

the desired services while confining software changes to our own

system and, in particular, to avoid requiring that user FTP

processes or the File Transfer Protocol itself be modified.

It was, however, the consensus of those present at the meeting that

it was preferable to modify FTP in such a way that all required

parameters could be explicitly declared, rather than require that

they be hidden within what purported to be simply a user name.

The intent of this RFC is to list what we (the NIC) believe were the

new FTP commands it was agreed should be defined in support of mail

submission and delivery. Actually, we've done some massaging after

thinking about the issues for awhile, and so this is really a

description of what we'd like to see included in the File Transfer

Protocol (following the lines of thought which developed at the

meeting), along with a short description of how the NIC would use

them.

Some of the commands currently make sense only if issued TO the NIC's

FTP server process (as opposed to anybody else's) and others only if

issued BY the NIC's FTP user process (as opposed to anybody else's).

This is true because currently only the NIC plans to offer mail

forwarding and recording (i.e., the Journal System) as a service.

However, other hosts may in the future desire to implement a similar

service, at which time these special commands will have wider use.

Conceptually, all of these commands are sub-commands of a new MAIL

command, but the intent for the moment is not to define their

position within the FTP dialogue nor their syntax, but simply to

describe them conceptually. Details of syntax and use are left to

the FTP Interest Group which meets 16-MAR-73 in Boston (see --

14333,).

The new sub-commands are described below. Bracketed fields are

...