Browse Prior Art Database

Official ARPA-Internet protocols (RFC0944)

IP.com Disclosure Number: IPCOM000004940D
Original Publication Date: 1985-Apr-01
Included in the Prior Art Database: 2001-Jul-12
Document File: 79 page(s) / 62K

Publishing Venue

Internet Society Requests For Comment (RFCs)

Related People

J.K. Reynolds: AUTHOR [+2]

Abstract

This RFC identifies the documents specifying the official protocols used in the Internet. Comments indicate any revisions or changes planned.

This text was extracted from a ASCII Text document.
This is the abbreviated version, containing approximately 7% of the total text.

Network Working Group J. Reynolds Request for Comments: 944 J. Postel

ISI Obsoletes: RFCs 924, 901, 880, 840 April 1985

OFFICIAL ARPA-INTERNET PROTOCOLS

STATUS OF THIS MEMO

This memo is an official status report on the protocols used in the ARPA-Internet community. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.

INTRODUCTION

This RFC identifies the documents specifying the official protocols used in the Internet. Comments indicate any revisions or changes planned.

To first order, the official protocols are those in the "Internet Protocol Transition Workbook" (IPTW) dated March 1982. There are several protocols in use that are not in the IPTW. A few of the protocols in the IPTW have been revised. Notably, the mail protocols have been revised and issued as a volume titled "Internet Mail Protocols" dated November 1982. Telnet and the most useful Telnet options have been revised and issued as a volume titled "Internet Telnet Protocol and Options" (ITP) dated June 1983. Some protocols have not been revised for many years, these are found in the old "ARPANET Protocol Handbook" (APH) dated January 1978. There is also a volume of protocol related information called the "Internet Protocol Implementers Guide" (IPIG) dated August 1982.

This document is organized as a sketchy outline. The entries are protocols (e.g., Transmission Control Protocol). In each entry there are notes on status, specification, comments, other references, dependencies, and contact.

The STATUS is one of: required, recommended, elective, or experimental.

The SPECIFICATION identifies the protocol defining documents.

The COMMENTS describe any differences from the specification or problems with the protocol.

The OTHER REFERENCES identify documents that comment on or expand on the protocol.

The DEPENDENCIES indicate what other protocols are called upon by this protocol.

Reynolds Postel [Page 1]

Official ARPA-Internet Protocols RFC 944

The CONTACT indicates a person who can answer questions about the protocol.

In particular, the status may be:

required

all hosts must implement the required protocol,

recommended

all hosts are encouraged to implement the recommended protocol,

elective

hosts may implement or not the elective protocol,

experimental

hosts should not implement the experimental protocol unless they are participating in the experiment and have coordinated their use of this protocol with the contact person, and

none

this is not a protocol.

For further information about protocols in general, please contact:

Joyce Reynolds USC Information Sciences Institute 4676 Admiralty Way Marina del Rey, California 90292-6695

Phone: (213) 822-1511

ARPA mail: JKREYNOLDS@USC-ISIF.ARPA

Reynolds Postel [Page 2]

Official ARPA-Internet Protocols RFC 944

OVERVIEW

Catenet Model

STATUS: None

SPECIFICATION: IEN 48 (in IPTW)

COMMENTS:

Gives an overview of the organization and principles of the Internet.

Could be revised and expanded.

OTHER REFERENCES:

RFC 871 A Perspective on the ARPANET Reference Model

Padlipsky, M.A., "The Elements of Networking Style and...