Browse Prior Art Database

Internet Official Protocol Standards (RFC2700)

IP.com Disclosure Number: IPCOM000004996D
Original Publication Date: 2000-Aug-01
Included in the Prior Art Database: 2001-Jul-13
Document File: 33 page(s) / 90K

Publishing Venue

Internet Society Requests For Comment (RFCs)

Related People

J. Reynolds: AUTHOR [+2]

Abstract

This memo describes the current state of standardization of protocols used in the Internet as determined by the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Sections 3.1 - 3.6 contain the lists of protocols in each stage of standardization - Standard, Draft Standard, Proposed Standard, Experimental and Historic. Protocols that are new to this document or have been moved from one protocol level to another, or differ from the previous edition of this document are marked. Informational Request for Comments (RFCs) are not included. This memo lists the current protocols; it is not a complete index to RFCs.

This text was extracted from a ASCII Text document.
This is the abbreviated version, containing approximately 5% of the total text.

Network Working Group Internet Engineering Task Force Request for Comments: 2700 J. Reynolds Obsoletes: 2600, 2500, 2400, 2300, 2200, 2000, R. Braden 1920, 1880, 1800, 1780, 1720, 1610, 1600, 1540, Editors 1500, 1410, 1360, 1280, 1250, 1200, 1140, 1130, August 2000 1100, 1083 STD: 1 Category: Standards Track

Internet Official Protocol Standards

Status of this Memo

This memo describes the state of standardization of protocols used in the Internet as determined by the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). This memo is an Internet Standard. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.

Copyright Notice

Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2000). All Rights Reserved.

Abstract

This memo describes the current state of standardization of protocols used in the Internet as determined by the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Sections 3.1 3.6 contain the lists of protocols in each stage of standardization Standard, Draft Standard, Proposed Standard, Experimental and Historic. Protocols that are new to this document or have been moved from one protocol level to another, or differ from the previous edition of this document are marked. Informational Request for Comments (RFCs) are not included. This memo lists the current protocols; it is not a complete index to RFCs.

IETF Standards Track [Page 1]

RFC 2700 Internet Standards August 2000

Table of Contents

1. Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 2. Contacts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 2.1. IAB, IETF, and IRTF Contacts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 2.2. Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) Contact . . . 3 2.3. Request for Comments Editor (RFC Editor) Contact . . . . 3 2.4. Requests for Comments Distribution Contact . . . . . . . 3 2.5. Sources for Requests for Comments . . . . . . . . . . . 4 3. Current Technical Specifications . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 3.1. Standard Protocols Ordered by STD . . . . . . . . . . . 5 3.2. Standard Protocols Ordered by RFC . . . . . . . . . . . 7 3.3. Draft Standard Protocols . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 3.4. Proposed Standard Protocols . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 3.5. Experimental Protocols . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 3.6. Historic Protocols . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 4. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 5. Editors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 6. Full Copyright Statement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32

1. Overview

This memo describes the current state of standardization of protocols used in the Internet as determined by the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Sections 3.1 3.6 contain the lists of protocols in each stage of standardization Standard, Draft Standard, Proposed Standard, Experimental and Historic. Protocols that are new to this document or have been moved from one protocol level to another, or differ from the previous edition of this document are marked. Informational Request for Comments (RFCs) are not included. This memo lists the cur...