Browse Prior Art Database

Secure Domain Name System (DNS) Dynamic Update (RFC3007)

IP.com Disclosure Number: IPCOM000005199D
Original Publication Date: 2000-Nov-01
Included in the Prior Art Database: 2001-Aug-17
Document File: 10 page(s) / 18K

Publishing Venue

Internet Society Requests For Comment (RFCs)

Related People

B. Wellington: AUTHOR

Abstract

This document proposes a method for performing secure Domain Name System (DNS) dynamic updates. The method described here is intended to be flexible and useful while requiring as few changes to the protocol as possible. The authentication of the dynamic update message is separate from later DNSSEC validation of the data. Secure communication based on authenticated requests and transactions is used to provide authorization.

This text was extracted from a ASCII document.
This is the abbreviated version, containing approximately 18% of the total text.

Network Working Group B. Wellington Request for Comments: 3007 Nominum Updates: 2535, 2136 November 2000 Obsoletes: 2137 Category: Standards Track

Secure Domain Name System (DNS) Dynamic Update

Status of this Memo

This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.

Copyright Notice

Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2000). All Rights Reserved.

Abstract

This document proposes a method for performing secure Domain Name System (DNS) dynamic updates. The method described here is intended to be flexible and useful while requiring as few changes to the protocol as possible. The authentication of the dynamic update message is separate from later DNSSEC validation of the data. Secure communication based on authenticated requests and transactions is used to provide authorization.

The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [RFC2119].

1 Introduction

This document defines a means to secure dynamic updates of the Domain Name System (DNS), allowing only authorized sources to make changes to a zone's contents. The existing unsecured dynamic update operations form the basis for this work.

Familiarity with the DNS system [RFC1034, RFC1035] and dynamic update [RFC2136] is helpful and is assumed by this document. In addition, knowledge of DNS security extensions [RFC2535], SIG(0) transaction security [RFC2535, RFC2931], and TSIG transaction security [RFC2845] is recommended.

Wellington Standards Track [Page 1]

RFC 3007 Secure Dynamic Update November 2000

This document updates portions of RFC 2535, in particular section 3.1.2, and RFC 2136. This document obsoletes RFC 2137, an alternate proposal for secure dynamic update, due to implementation experience.

1.1 Overview of DNS Dynamic Update

DNS dynamic update defines a new DNS opcode and a new interpretation of the DNS message if that opcode is used. An update can specify insertions or deletions of data, along with prerequisites necessary for the updates to occur. All tests and changes for a DNS update request are restricted to a single zone, and are performed at the primary server for the zone. The primary server for a dynamic zone must increment the zone SOA serial number when an update occurs or before the next retrieval of the SOA.

1.2 Overview of DNS Transaction Security

Exchanges of DNS messages which include TSIG [RFC2845] or SIG(0) [RFC2535, RFC2931] records allow two DNS entities to authenticate DNS requests and responses sent between t...