Browse Prior Art Database

Learning" Algorithm For A Registration Device To Reject Average Image Motion Disturbances

IP.com Disclosure Number: IPCOM000019198D
Publication Date: 2003-Sep-03
Document File: 5 page(s) / 140K

Publishing Venue

The IP.com Prior Art Database

Abstract

One of the key enablers for high speed printing is to be able to perform proper image to paper registration at high process velocities. By learning the average (i.e. repeatable) drum motion variations during the registration process, the registration of each individual sheet can be adjusted by the sheet registration mechanism to compensate for the average drum motion variations.

This text was extracted from a Microsoft Word document.
At least one non-text object (such as an image or picture) has been suppressed.
This is the abbreviated version, containing approximately 42% of the total text.

Learning" Algorithm For A Registration Device To Reject Average Image Motion Disturbances

One of the key enablers for high speed printing is to be able to perform proper image to paper registration at high process velocities.

To achieve accurate image to paper registration, two requirements have to be fulfilled:
1) The image has to arrive at the transfer nip at the desired time and the desired velocity
2) The paper has to arrive at the transfer nip at the desired time and the desired velocity
In one printer configuration, the imaging drum carries the image to the transfer nip, while the registration mechanism carries the paper to the transfer nip.


The problem is that the drum velocity varies around the nominal. This causes the image to arrive at the image transfer nip at a different time than intended, violating requirement 1) above.

By learning the average (i.e. repeatable) drum motion variations during the registration process, the registration of each individual sheet can be adjusted by the sheet registration mechanism to compensate for the average drum motion variations. Most of the drum velocity variation is periodic and repeatable due to the periodic nature of the disturbance caused for example by the periodic engagement and disengagement of drive train elements.

Due to a variety of torque disturbances the, drum velocity v(t) varies away from the desired nominal velocity, vd, as shown below where the dashed line corresponds to the nominal drum velocity, and the solid line is the actual velocity during transfix engage / disengage cycles.

This implies that the position of an image on the drum, defined as x(t) = ∫ v(t) dt = R θ(t) where R is the drum diameter (nominally 90 or 110 mm), and θ(t) is the accumulated drum rotation angle for this image, is different than the desired position which is xd(t) = ∫ vd(t) dt = vd t + C, where C is a constant offset position for each sheet.

The difference between the image position and its desired position at any given time t, (i.e. the image position error is e(t) = xd(t) - x(t)) is shown in the figure below. The circles corresponds to the start of a registration move, i.e. t = tr, and the stars correspond to the start of an image transfer, i.e. t = tf (e.g., at around t = 23 s, the image position error changes approximately from -0.008 to -0.011 m, i.e. 3 mm from the start to the end of the registration move). This would result in a 3 mm process direction registration error due to drum movement during the registration interval with the current open loop control algorithm.

The registration move starts at time t = tr, when the lead edge (LE) of the paper entering the registration station covers both registration roll sensors, the so called P1 & P2 sensors. At this time, the controller calculates a move time based on the difference between the time the paper LE has to arrive at the transfer nip and the current time. It then executes a paper registration motion profile to achieve this move time. Th...