Browse Prior Art Database

Tracking Reviews of Documents (RFC7735)

IP.com Disclosure Number: IPCOM000245085D
Original Publication Date: 2016-Jan-01
Included in the Prior Art Database: 2016-Feb-08
Document File: 32 page(s) / 35K

Publishing Venue

Internet Society Requests For Comment (RFCs)

Related People

R. Sparks: AUTHOR [+2]

Abstract

As Internet-Drafts are processed, reviews are requested from several review teams. For example, the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) and the Security Directorate (SecDir) perform reviews of documents that are in IETF Last Call. Gen-ART always performs a follow-up review when the document is scheduled for an IESG Telechat. SecDir usually performs a follow-up review, but the SecDir secretary may choose not to request that follow-up if any issues identified at Last Call are addressed and there are otherwise no major changes to the document. These teams also perform earlier reviews of documents on demand. There are several other teams that perform similar services, often focusing on specific areas of expertise.

This text was extracted from an ASCII text file.
This is the abbreviated version, containing approximately 8% of the total text.

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)                         R. Sparks Request for Comments: 7735                                        Oracle Category: Informational                                       T. Kivinen ISSN: 2070-1721                                            INSIDE Secure                                                             January 2016

                      Tracking Reviews of Documents

Abstract

   Several review teams ensure specific types of review are performed on    Internet-Drafts as they progress towards becoming RFCs.  The tools    used by these teams to assign and track reviews would benefit from    tighter integration to the Datatracker.  This document discusses    requirements for improving those tools without disrupting current    work flows.

Status of This Memo

   This document is not an Internet Standards Track specification; it is    published for informational purposes.

   This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force    (IETF).  It represents the consensus of the IETF community.  It has    received public review and has been approved for publication by the    Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG).  Not all documents    approved by the IESG are a candidate for any level of Internet    Standard; see Section 2 of RFC 5741.

   Information about the current status of this document, any errata,    and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at    http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7735.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (c) 2016 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the    document authors.  All rights reserved.

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal    Provisions Relating to IETF Documents    (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of    publication of this document.  Please review these documents    carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect    to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must    include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of    the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as    described in the Simplified BSD License.

Sparks & Kivinen              Informational                     [Page 1]
 RFC 7735                     Review Tracking                January 2016

 Table of Contents

   1.  Introduction  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2

   2.  Overview of Current Workflows . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3

   3.  Requirements  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5

     3.1.  Secretariat Focused . . . . ....