Browse Prior Art Database

Request For Comments reference guide (RFC1000)

IP.com Disclosure Number: IPCOM000001803D
Original Publication Date: 1987-Aug-01
Included in the Prior Art Database: 2019-Feb-15

Publishing Venue

Internet Society Requests For Comment (RFCs)

Related People

J.K. Reynolds: AUTHOR [+1]

Related Documents

10.17487/RFC1000: DOI

Abstract

This RFC Reference Guide is intended to provide a historical account by categorizing and summarizing of the Request for Comments numbers 1 through 999 issued between the years 1969-1987. These documents have been crossed referenced to indicate which RFCs are current, obsolete, or revised.

This text was extracted from a PDF file.
This is the abbreviated version, containing approximately 1% of the total text.

Network Working Group J. Reynolds Request for Comments: 1000 J. Postel ISI August 1987

Obsoletes: RFCs 084, 100, 160, 170, 200, 598, 699, 800, 899, 999

THE REQUEST FOR COMMENTS REFERENCE GUIDE

STATUS OF THIS MEMO

This RFC is a reference guide for the Internet community which summarizes of all the Request for Comments issued between April 1969 and March 1987. This guide also categorizes the RFCs by topic.

INTRODUCTION

This RFC Reference Guide is intended to provide a historical account by categorizing and summarizing of the Request for Comments numbers 1 through 999 issued between the years 1969-1987. These documents have been crossed referenced to indicate which RFCs are current, obsolete, or revised. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.

THE ORIGINS OF RFCS - by Stephen D. Crocker

The DDN community now includes hundreds of nodes and thousands of users, but once it was all a gleam in Larry Roberts’ eye. While much of the development proceeded according to a grand plan, the design of the protocols and the creation of the RFCs was largely accidental.

The procurement of the ARPANET was initiated in the summer of 1968 -- Remember Vietnam, flower children, etc? There had been prior experiments at various ARPA sites to link together computer systems, but this was the first version to explore packet-switching on a grand scale. ("ARPA" didn’t become "DARPA" until 1972.) Unlike most of the ARPA/IPTO procurements of the day, this was a competitive procurement. The contract called for four IMPs to be delivered to UCLA, SRI, UCSB and The University of Utah. These sites were running a Sigma 7 with the SEX operating system, an SDS 940 with the Genie operating system, an IBM 360/75 with OS/MVT (or perhaps OS/MFT), and a DEC PDP-10 with the Tenex operating system. Options existed for additional nodes if the first experiments were successful. BBN won the procurement in December 1968, but that gets ahead of this story.

Part of the reason for selecting these four sites was these were existing ARPA computer science research contractors. The precise usage of the ARPANET was not spelled out in advance, and the research community could be counted on to take some initiative. To stimulate this process, a meeting was called during the summer with representatives from the selected sites, chaired by Elmer Shapiro

Reynolds & Postel [Page 1]

RFC 1000 - Request for Comments Reference Guide August 1987

from SRI. If memory serves me correctly, Jeff Rulifson came from SRI, Ron Stoughton from UCSB, Steve Carr from Utah and I came from UCLA. (Apologies to anyone I’ve left out; records are inaccessible or lost at this point.) At this point we knew only that the network was coming, but the precise details weren’t known.

That first meeting was seminal. We had lots of questions -- how IMPs and hosts would be connected, what hosts would say to each other, and what applications would be supported. No one had any answers, but the prospects seemed exciting. We found ourselves imagini...

Processing...
Loading...