Browse Prior Art Database

Official Internet protocols (RFC1011)

IP.com Disclosure Number: IPCOM000001815D
Original Publication Date: 1987-May-01
Included in the Prior Art Database: 2019-Feb-15
Document File: 52 page(s) / 50K

Publishing Venue

Internet Society Requests For Comment (RFCs)

Related People

J.K. Reynolds: AUTHOR [+1]

Related Documents

10.17487/RFC1011: DOI

Abstract

This memo is an official status report on the protocols used in the Internet community. It identifies the documents specifying the official protocols used in the Internet. Comments indicate any revisions or changes planned.

This text was extracted from a PDF file.
This is the abbreviated version, containing approximately 7% of the total text.

Network Working Group J. Reynolds Request for Comments: 1011 J. Postel ISI Obsoletes: RFCs 991, 961, 943, 924, 901, 880, 840 May 1987

OFFICIAL INTERNET PROTOCOLS

STATUS OF THIS MEMO

This memo is an official status report on the protocols used in the Internet community. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.

INTRODUCTION

This RFC identifies the documents specifying the official protocols used in the Internet. Comments indicate any revisions or changes planned.

To first order, the official protocols are those specified in the "DDN Protocol Handbook" (DPH), dated December 1985 (this is a three volume set with a total thickness of about 5 inches).

Older collections that include many of these specifications are the "Internet Protocol Transition Workbook" (IPTW), dated March 1982; the "Internet Mail Protocols", dated November 1982; and the "Internet Telnet Protocols and Options", dated June 1983. There is also a volume of protocol related information called the "Internet Protocol Implementers Guide" (IPIG) dated August 1982. An even older collection is the "ARPANET Protocol Handbook" (APH) dated January 1978. Nearly all the relevant material from these collections has been reproduced in the current DPH.

The following material is organized as a sketchy outline. The entries are protocols (e.g., Transmission Control Protocol). In each entry there are notes on status, specification, comments, other references, dependencies, and contact.

The STATUS is one of: required, recommended, elective, experimental, or none.

The SPECIFICATION identifies the protocol defining documents.

The COMMENTS describe any differences from the specification or problems with the protocol.

The OTHER REFERENCES identify documents that comment on or expand on the protocol.

Reynolds & Postel [Page 1]

RFC 1011 - Official Internet Protocols May 1987

The DEPENDENCIES indicate what other protocols are called upon by this protocol.

The CONTACT indicates a person who can answer questions about the protocol.

In particular, the status may be:

required

- all hosts must implement the required protocol,

recommended

- all hosts are encouraged to implement the recommended protocol,

elective

- hosts may implement or not the elective protocol,

experimental

- hosts should not implement the experimental protocol unless they are participating in the experiment and have coordinated their use of this protocol with the contact person, and

none

- this is not a protocol.

For further information about protocols in general, please contact:

Joyce K. Reynolds USC - Information Sciences Institute 4676 Admiralty Way Marina del Rey, California 90292-6695

Phone: (213) 822-1511

Electronic mail: JKREYNOLDS@ISI.EDU

Reynolds & Postel [Page 2]

RFC 1011 - Official Internet Protocols May 1987

OVERVIEW

Catenet Model ------------------------------------------------------

STATUS: None

SPECIFICATION: IEN 48 (in DPH)

COMMENTS:

Gives an overview of the organization and principles of the Internet.

Could be revised and expan...

Processing...
Loading...