Browse Prior Art Database

Simple Gateway Monitoring Protocol (RFC1028) Disclosure Number: IPCOM000001832D
Original Publication Date: 1987-Nov-01
Included in the Prior Art Database: 2000-Sep-12
Document File: 30 page(s) / 75K

Publishing Venue

Internet Society Requests For Comment (RFCs)

Related People

J.D. Case: AUTHOR [+3]


1. Status of this Memo

This text was extracted from a ASCII document.
This is the abbreviated version, containing approximately 4% of the total text.

Network Working Group J. Davin

Request for Comments: 1028 Proteon, Inc.

J. Case

University of Tennessee at Knoxville

M. Fedor

Cornell University

M. Schoffstall

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute

November 1987

A Simple Gateway Monitoring Protocol

1. Status of this Memo

This document is being distributed to members of the Internet

community in order to solicit their reactions to the proposals

contained in it. While the issues discussed may not be directly

relevant to the research problems of the Internet, they may be

interesting to a number of researchers and implementors.

This memo defines a simple application-layer protocol by which

management information for a gateway may be inspected or altered by

logically remote users.

This proposal is intended only as an interim response to immediate

gateway monitoring needs while work on more elaborate and robust

designs proceeds with the care and deliberation appropriate to that

task. Accordingly, long term use of the mechanisms described here

should be seriously questioned as more comprehensive proposals emerge

in the future. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.

2. Protocol Design Strategy

The proposed protocol is shaped in large part by the desire to

minimize the number and complexity of management functions realized

by the gateway itself. This goal is attractive in at least four


(1) The development cost for gateway software necessary to

support the protocol is accordingly reduced.

(2) The degree of management function that is remotely

supported is accordingly increased, thereby admitting

fullest use of internet resources in the management task.

(3) The degree of management function that is remotely

supported is accordingly increased, thereby imposing the

fewest possible restrictions on the form and sophistication

of management tools.

(4) A simplified set of management functions is easily

understood and used by developers of gateway management


A second design goal is that the functional paradigm for monitoring

and control be sufficiently extensible to accommodate additional,