Browse Prior Art Database

Time-Out Mechanism in the Host-Host Protocol (RFC0142) Disclosure Number: IPCOM000002246D
Original Publication Date: 1971-May-01
Included in the Prior Art Database: 2019-Feb-10
Document File: 2 page(s) / 3K

Publishing Venue

Internet Society Requests For Comment (RFCs)

Related People

C. Kline: AUTHOR [+1]

Related Documents

10.17487/RFC0142: DOI

This text was extracted from a PDF file.
This is the abbreviated version, containing approximately 57% of the total text.

Network Working Group Charley Kline Request for Comments #142 Johnny Wong NIC #6727 UCLA (NMC) Categories: C.1, C.2, C.3, C.5 3 May 71 Updates: none Obsoletes: none

Time-out Mechanism in the Host-Host Protocol

On sending a message to a foreign site, the following situations can occur:

1. Destination IMP down - Type 7 message is returned

2. Destination IMP up but destination IMP-HOST interface is down - Type 7 message is returned.

3. Destination IMP and IMP-HOST interface up, but IMP-HOST inter- face is not taking messages - Type 9 message is returned after IMP time-out (ask BBN for time).

4. Destination IMP and IMP-HOST interface up and IMP-HOST inter- face is taking messages - Type 5 (rfnm) message is returned.

A suggestion for handling type 7 and type 9 messages has been made in NWG/RFC #117. In this document we would like to discuss in detail the problem: what should happen to the HOST-HOST protocol on receiving a rfnm?

When a NCP sends out a STR or RTS control command on a pair of sockets and gets a rfnm back, this pair of sockets will be in a wait-match state. Everything is fine if a matching RTS or STR, or CLS is returned after a reasonable amount of delay. Trouble will arise when nothing is returned after a long time.

This can happen if the NCP is not running at all but its host is taking in messages (e.g. UCLA’s host will receive messages even if the NCP is not running), or if the NCP is running very slowly. The same problem exists on sending out a CLS control command and a matching CLS is never returned. The trouble is that resources are tied up, e.g. sockets, links and table space in the NCP; and one would like to release these resources. In our implementation, when a user does a CLOSE, we can’t release the sockets until the matching CLS is returned. This protects us from getting confused if a seconds request is made for the same pair of sockets. This problem can be solved by including a time-out mechanism in the Host-Host protocol. This operates as follows:

[Page 1]

ne 5 a. On sending out a STR or RTS and if you do not get back a match- ing RTS or STR, or a CLS in T time units a CLS will be sent. After sending the time-out CLS race condition can be avoided by ignoring the matching R...