Browse Prior Art Database

Review of Roaming Implementations (RFC2194)

IP.com Disclosure Number: IPCOM000002752D
Original Publication Date: 1997-Sep-01
Included in the Prior Art Database: 2019-Feb-15
Document File: 35 page(s) / 50K

Publishing Venue

Internet Society Requests For Comment (RFCs)

Related People

B. Aboba: AUTHOR [+4]

Related Documents

10.17487/RFC2194: DOI

Abstract

This document reviews the design and functionality of existing roaming implementations. Examples of cases where roaming capability might be required include ISP "confederations" and ISP-provided corporate network access support. This memo provides information for the Internet community. This memo does not specify an Internet standard of any kind.

This text was extracted from a PDF file.
This is the abbreviated version, containing approximately 5% of the total text.

Network Working Group B. Aboba Request for Comments: 2194 Microsoft Category: Informational J. Lu AimQuest Corp. J. Alsop i-Pass Alliance J. Ding Asiainfo W. Wang Merit Network, Inc. September 1997

Review of Roaming Implementations

1. Status of this Memo

This memo provides information for the Internet community. This memo does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.

2. Abstract

This document reviews the design and functionality of existing roaming implementations. "Roaming capability" may be loosely defined as the ability to use any one of multiple Internet service providers (ISPs), while maintaining a formal, customer-vendor relationship with only one. Examples of cases where roaming capability might be required include ISP "confederations" and ISP-provided corporate network access support.

3. Introduction

Considerable interest has arisen recently in a set of features that fit within the general category of "roaming capability" for Internet users. Interested parties have included:

Regional Internet Service Providers (ISPs) operating within a particular state or province, looking to combine their efforts with those of other regional providers to offer service over a wider area.

National ISPs wishing to combine their operations with those of one or more ISPs in another nation to offer more comprehensive service in a group of countries or on a continent.

Businesses desiring to offer their employees a comprehensive package of access services on a global basis. Those services may

Aboba, et. al. Informational [Page 1]

RFC 2194 Review of Roaming Implementations September 1997

include Internet access as well as secure access to corporate intranets via a Virtual Private Network (VPN), enabled by tunneling protocols such as PPTP, L2F, or L2TP.

What is required to provide roaming capability? The following list is a first cut at defining the requirements for successful roaming among an arbitrary set of ISPs:

Phone number presentation Phone number exchange Phone book compilation Phone book update Connection management Authentication NAS Configuration/Authorization Address assignment and routing Security Accounting

In this document we review existing roaming implementations, describing their functionality within this framework. In addition to full fledged roaming implementations, we will also review implementations that, while not meeting the strict definition of roaming, address several of these problem elements. These implementations typically fall into the category of shared use networks or non-IP dialup networks.

3.1. Terminology

This document frequently uses the following terms:

home ISP This is the Internet service provider with whom the user maintains an account relationship.

local ISP This is the Internet service provider whom the user calls in order to get access. Where roaming is implemented the local ISP may be different from the home ISP.

phone book This is a database or document containing data pe...

Processing...
Loading...