Conformance Statements for SMIv2 (RFC2580)
Original Publication Date: 1999-Apr-01
Included in the Prior Art Database: 2019-Feb-11
Publishing Venue
Internet Society Requests For Comment (RFCs)
Related People
K. McCloghrie: AUTHOR [+2]
Related Documents
Abstract
Collections of related objects are defined in MIB modules. It may be useful to define the acceptable lower-bounds of implementation, along with the actual level of implementation achieved. It is the purpose of this document to define the notation used for these purposes. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Network Working Group Editors of this version: Request for Comments: 2580 K. McCloghrie STD: 58 Cisco Systems Obsoletes: 1904 D. Perkins Category: Standards Track SNMPinfo J. Schoenwaelder TU Braunschweig Authors of previous version: J. Case SNMP Research K. McCloghrie Cisco Systems M. Rose First Virtual Holdings S. Waldbusser International Network Services April 1999
Conformance Statements for SMIv2
Status of this Memo
This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (1999). All Rights Reserved.
Table of Contents
1 Introduction .....................................................3 1.1 A Note on Terminology ..........................................3 2 Definitions ......................................................3 2.1 The OBJECT-GROUP macro .........................................3 2.2 The NOTIFICATION-GROUP macro ...................................4 2.3 The MODULE-COMPLIANCE macro ....................................5 2.4 The AGENT-CAPABILITIES macro ...................................7 3 Mapping of the OBJECT-GROUP macro ...............................10 3.1 Mapping of the OBJECTS clause .................................10 3.2 Mapping of the STATUS clause ..................................11 3.3 Mapping of the DESCRIPTION clause .............................11 3.4 Mapping of the REFERENCE clause ...............................11
McCloghrie, et al. Standards Track [Page 1]
RFC 2580 Conformance Statements for SMIv2 April 1999
3.5 Mapping of the OBJECT-GROUP value .............................11 3.6 Usage Example .................................................12 4 Mapping of the NOTIFICATION-GROUP macro .........................12 4.1 Mapping of the NOTIFICATIONS clause ...........................12 4.2 Mapping of the STATUS clause ..................................13 4.3 Mapping of the DESCRIPTION clause .............................13 4.4 Mapping of the REFERENCE clause ...............................13 4.5 Mapping of the NOTIFICATION-GROUP value .......................13 4.6 Usage Example .................................................13 5 Mapping of the MODULE-COMPLIANCE macro ..........................14 5.1 Mapping of the STATUS clause ..................................14 5.2 Mapping of the DESCRIPTION clause .............................14 5.3 Mapping of the REFERENCE clause ...............................15 5.4 Mapping of the MODULE clause ..................................15 5.4.1 Mapping of the MANDATORY-GROUPS clause ......................15 5.4.2 Mapping of the GROUP clause .................................15 5.4.3 Mapping of the OBJECT clause ................................16 5.4.3.1 Ma...
